Technology integration in teaching and learning: Difference between revisions
From Iskomunidad
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
==Readings== | ==Readings== | ||
* [http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hiltzik-20120205,0,639053.column Michael Hiltzik (2012) Who really benefits from putting high-tech gadgets in classrooms? LA Times] | |||
* [http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/tomorrows-college/lectures/ Emily Hanford (2012) "Don't Lecture Me" American RadioWorks] | |||
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/06/science/daphne-koller-technology-as-a-passport-to-personalized-education.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all Daphne Koller (2011) "Death Knell for the Lecture: Technology as a Passport to Personalized Education" NY Times] | * [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/06/science/daphne-koller-technology-as-a-passport-to-personalized-education.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all Daphne Koller (2011) "Death Knell for the Lecture: Technology as a Passport to Personalized Education" NY Times] | ||
[[Category:Educational Technologies]] | [[Category:Educational Technologies]] | ||
Revision as of 14:57, 6 February 2012
This page outlines the initiatives and challenges in teaching and learning with technology at the University of the Philippines System.
Why integrate technology in teaching and learning
- Educational technologies help students acquire some of the skills necessary in the "real world"
- With the aid of technology, teachers can ease up instructional routines and manage classes more effectively
Initiatives in technology integration at UP
- training workshops for UPD teachers through DILC
- University Academic Technologies Committee
Challenges to the use of technology in teaching and learning at UP
- Misconceptions about information technology
- highly uneven ICT infrastructure on campus (e.g., this)