Busting plagiarism: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:33, 26 August 2010

Description: This workshop for the UP faculty examines the pedagogical issues involved in plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty. Faculty participants will learn to detect plagiarism with the aid of electronic tools and know the legal basis for busting plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty. This workshop will be streamed live to other UP constituent universities.
Objectives
- examine the pedagogical issues involved in plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty
- learn to detect plagiarism with the aid of electronic tools
- know the legal basis for busting plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty.
Methodology: panel discussion from different fields; use of detection tools
Stream and Feedback
- Stream: DILC site, PREGINET server
- Feedback: DILC Webchat
Program (Monday, 27 Sept 2010, 2-5pm, DILC)

TIME	TOPIC	RESOURCE SPEAKER
2:00-2:45pm	Definitional and Legal Issues: Elements of plagiarism, examples from different domains	Vyva Aguirre Dean, School of Library and Information Studies
2:45-3:30pm	Pedagogical Prevention of Plagiarism: Steps teachers can do to help prevent plagiarism in class	Dina Ocampo Dean, College of Education
3:30-3:45pm	Break
3:45-4:30pm	Tools Available and Methodological Issues in Busting Plagiarism: Use of certain tools to detect and substantiate instances of plagiarism	Cedric Festin Associate Professor, Computer Science
4:30-5:00pm	Open Forum / Demo

Workshop participants: UPD faculty (residential) and remote viewers
Pre-Workshop Assignment for Residential Participants
- What are your expectations from the workshop?
- Please formulate 3 questions that you want the resource persons to address.
- If you got hold of materials that you think are plagiarized, please send it to us.

Collaboration. "Real world" jobs require people to work together. Shouldn't students start "collaborating" in school? How or when does collaboration become "cheating"?
Knowledge and skills assessment. Which methods of assessment discourage cheating? Are exams, term papers effective in the assessment of students' knowledge?
Intellectual dishonesty and licenses (copyright, Creative Commons, open source). Certain licenses encourage "copying" but certainly not cheating.
What courses of action at various levels (department, college, university) are due to address plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty?

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ** know the legal basis for busting plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty.<br /><br />
 * '''Methodology''': panel discussion from different fields; [[How to detect plagiarism|use of detection tools]]<br /><br />
-* '''Workshop schedule and venue''': Monday, 27 Sept 2010, 2-5pm, DILC
-* '''Workshop participants''': UPD faculty (residential) and remote viewers<br /><br />
 * '''Stream and Feedback'''
 ** Stream: [http://www.dilc.upd.edu.ph/videocon/ DILC site], PREGINET server
 ** Feedback: [http://www.dilc.upd.edu.ph/index.php/chat DILC Webchat]<br /><br />
-* '''Program'''
+* '''Program''' (Monday, 27 Sept 2010, 2-5pm, DILC)
 {| class="wikitable" border="1"
@@ Line 45: / Line 43: @@
 |}
 <br /><br />
+* '''Workshop participants''': UPD faculty (residential) and remote viewers<br /><br />
+* '''Pre-Workshop Assignment for Residential Participants'''
+** What are your expectations from the workshop?
+** Please formulate 3 questions that you want the resource persons to address.
+** If you got hold of materials that you think are plagiarized, please send it to us.<br />
 ==Related Issues==
 # Collaboration. "Real world" jobs require people to work together. Shouldn't students start "collaborating" in school? How or when does collaboration become "cheating"?