Plagiarism and Misrepresentation in the Supreme Court: Difference between revisions
From Iskomunidad
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''News Reports''' | '''News Reports''' | ||
* [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101023-299231/High-tribunal-vs-UP-Law High tribunal vs UP Law]: 23 Oct 2010 | |||
* [http://bworldonline.com/main/content.php?id=19827 Court to UP Law faculty: Explain improper conduct] (BusinessWorld, 20 Oct 2010) | * [http://bworldonline.com/main/content.php?id=19827 Court to UP Law faculty: Explain improper conduct] (BusinessWorld, 20 Oct 2010) | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
* [[Busting plagiarism]] | * [[Busting plagiarism]] | ||
Revision as of 20:05, 23 October 2010
This page documents "Plagiarism and Misrepresentation in the Supreme Court" as it relates to Vinuya v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 162230, 28 April 2010 (also here, here).
Primary Documents
- A UP Law Statement on Plagiarism and Misrepresentation in the Supreme Court - 27 July 2010
- Author Christian J. Tams's complaint - 18 August 2010
- Dissenting Opion, Justice J Sereno -15 Oct 2010
News Reports
- High tribunal vs UP Law: 23 Oct 2010
- Court to UP Law faculty: Explain improper conduct (BusinessWorld, 20 Oct 2010)