Network Attached Storage: Difference between revisions

From Iskomunidad
Line 4: Line 4:
=Specs=
=Specs=
The system
The system
* uses NAS4free.org
* uses [http://www.nas4free.org/ NAS4free]
* embedded installation (USB)
* embedded installation (USB)
* protocols deployed SFTP, NFS, Samba, AFP, RSYNC
* protocols deployed SFTP, NFS, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samba_(software) Samba], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Filing_Protocol AFP], RSYNC
* intranet only
* intranet only
* ZFS  
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs ZFS]
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
==Deployment==
==Deployment==
Line 15: Line 15:


<br /><br />
<br /><br />
=Reviews=
=Reviews=
*[[Download/Upload Traffic Load using NFS, AFP, CIFS/SMB and SFTP]]
*[[Download/Upload Traffic Load using NFS, AFP, CIFS/SMB and SFTP]]

Revision as of 10:05, 25 April 2013

For its backup needs, DILC is initiating a network-attached storage (NAS) project. The goal of the project is to deploy inexpensive, reliable, robust, scalable backup system for DILC's use.

Specs

The system

  • uses NAS4free
  • embedded installation (USB)
  • protocols deployed SFTP, NFS, Samba, AFP, RSYNC
  • intranet only
  • ZFS



Deployment

  • Remote Site B: initial rollout: 4TB contiguous space, using 2x2TB commodity hard drives (expandable to 6x2TB; there appears to be a limit to hd size - 2TB - before getting errors). This is meant to cope with backup requirements that now exceed the capacity of Remote Site A (as of 21 April 2013):



Reviews



Development Team

  • Ma. Cristina Dalupan - Team Leader
  • Raff Alimbuyuguen
  • Don Cadavona
  • Thaniel Jay Duldulao
  • Dominick Tunac



To Dos

  • Webdav integration
  • throughput optimization
  • persistent automount
  • peer-to-peer syncing of files via direct private torrent