Plagiarism and Misrepresentation in the Supreme Court: Difference between revisions

From Iskomunidad
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:


'''News Reports'''
'''News Reports'''
* [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101030-300532/UP-backs-its-law-faculty-vs-SC-on-plagiarism UP backs its law faculty vs SC on plagiarism] (PDI, 30 Oct 2010)
* [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101027-299949/Foreign-authors-back-UP-law-profs Foreign authors back UP law profs] (PDI, 27 Oct 2010)
* [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101027-299949/Foreign-authors-back-UP-law-profs Foreign authors back UP law profs] (PDI, 27 Oct 2010)
* [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101023-299231/High-tribunal-vs-UP-Law High tribunal vs UP Law]: 23 Oct 2010
* [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101023-299231/High-tribunal-vs-UP-Law High tribunal vs UP Law]: 23 Oct 2010

Revision as of 13:48, 30 October 2010

This page documents "Plagiarism and Misrepresentation in the Supreme Court" as it relates to Vinuya v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 162230, 28 April 2010 (also here, here).

Primary Documents

Background Notes

News Reports

Online Petition

Social Networking

See Also