Plagiarism and Misrepresentation in the Supreme Court: Difference between revisions
From Iskomunidad
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
'''News Reports''' | '''News Reports''' | ||
* [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101023-299231/High-tribunal-vs-UP-Law High tribunal vs UP Law]: 23 Oct 2010 | * [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101023-299231/High-tribunal-vs-UP-Law High tribunal vs UP Law]: 23 Oct 2010 | ||
* [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101021-298871/Explain-SC-orders-UP-profs Explain, SC orders UP profs] (PDI, 21 Oct 2010) | |||
* [http://bworldonline.com/main/content.php?id=19827 Court to UP Law faculty: Explain improper conduct] (BusinessWorld, 20 Oct 2010) | * [http://bworldonline.com/main/content.php?id=19827 Court to UP Law faculty: Explain improper conduct] (BusinessWorld, 20 Oct 2010) | ||
Revision as of 05:57, 24 October 2010
This page documents "Plagiarism and Misrepresentation in the Supreme Court" as it relates to Vinuya v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 162230, 28 April 2010 (also here, here).
Primary Documents
- A UP Law Statement on Plagiarism and Misrepresentation in the Supreme Court - 27 July 2010
- Author Christian J. Tams's complaint - 18 August 2010
- Dissenting Opinion, Justice J Sereno -15 Oct 2010
Background Notes
- TIMELINE: The Back Stories & Main Story of the Contempt Case Against the UP Law Faculty
- Diane Desierto, "An Open Appeal to fellow International Legal Scholars"
News Reports
- High tribunal vs UP Law: 23 Oct 2010
- Explain, SC orders UP profs (PDI, 21 Oct 2010)
- Court to UP Law faculty: Explain improper conduct (BusinessWorld, 20 Oct 2010)
Online Petition