Busting plagiarism: Difference between revisions
From Iskomunidad
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Workshop== | ==Workshop== | ||
* Description: faculty workshop on intellectual dishonesty | * Description: faculty workshop on intellectual dishonesty | ||
* Objectives: examine the pedagogical issues involved in plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty; learn to detect plagiarism with the aid of electronic tools; know the legal basis | * Objectives: examine the pedagogical issues involved in plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty; learn to detect plagiarism with the aid of electronic tools; know the legal basis for busting plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty. | ||
* Methodology: panel discussion from different fields | * Methodology: panel discussion from different fields; [[How to detect plagiarism|use of detection tools]] | ||
* Workshop schedule and venue: Monday, 27 Sept 2010, 2-5pm, DILC | * Workshop schedule and venue: Monday, 27 Sept 2010, 2-5pm, DILC | ||
* Workshop participants: UPD faculty | * Workshop participants: UPD faculty | ||
Revision as of 17:16, 20 April 2010
Workshop
- Description: faculty workshop on intellectual dishonesty
- Objectives: examine the pedagogical issues involved in plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty; learn to detect plagiarism with the aid of electronic tools; know the legal basis for busting plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty.
- Methodology: panel discussion from different fields; use of detection tools
- Workshop schedule and venue: Monday, 27 Sept 2010, 2-5pm, DILC
- Workshop participants: UPD faculty
- Workshop program: panel discussions (pedagogical, legal, computational issues) - 2-3:30pm (1.5 hrs); skills acquisition - 3:30-5:00pm (1.5 hrs)
Related Issues
- Collaboration. "Real world" jobs require people to work together. Shouldn't students start "collaborating" in school? How or when does collaboration become "cheating"?
- Knowledge and skills assessment. Which methods of assessment discourage cheating? Are exams, term papers effective in the assessment of students' knowledge?
- Intellectual dishonesty and licenses (copyright, Creative Commons, open source). Certain licenses encourage "copying" but certainly not cheating.
- courses of action at various levels to address plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty: department, college, university, court
Suggested Readings
- 12.1. "Student Conduct and Discipline," UP Diliman Faculty Manual
- Why Computer Science Students Cheat
- Head and Eisenberg, "How today's college students use Wikipedia for course-related research"
- Jason Johnson, "Cut-and-Paste Is a Skill, Too," Washington Post, 25 March 2007
- Jonathan Lethem, "The ecstasy of influence: A plagiarism," Harper's, Feb 2007
- The Open University's approach to plagiarism
- How Plagiarism Software Found a New Shakespeare Play