Busting plagiarism: Difference between revisions

From Iskomunidad
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Workshop==
==Workshop==
* description: faculty workshop on intellectual dishonesty
* Description: faculty workshop on intellectual dishonesty
* objectives:  learn to detect plagiarism with the aid of electronic tools; start a nuanced conversation about intellectual dishonesty and plagiarism
* Objectives:  learn to detect plagiarism with the aid of electronic tools; know the legal basis of busting plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty, examine the pedagogical issues involved
* methodology: panel discussion from different fields, [[How to detect plagiarism|use of detection tools]]
* Methodology: panel discussion from different fields, [[How to detect plagiarism|use of detection tools]]
* workshop schedule and venue: Monday, 27 Sept 2010, 2-5pm, DILC
* Workshop schedule and venue: Monday, 27 Sept 2010, 2-5pm, DILC
* workshop participants: UPD faculty
* Workshop participants: UPD faculty
* workshop program: panel discussions (pedagogical, legal, computational issues) - 2-3:30pm (1.5 hrs); skills acquisition - 3:30-5:00pm (1.5 hrs)
* Workshop program: panel discussions (pedagogical, legal, computational issues) - 2-3:30pm (1.5 hrs); skills acquisition - 3:30-5:00pm (1.5 hrs)


==Related Issues==  
==Related Issues==  

Revision as of 09:06, 20 April 2010

Workshop

  • Description: faculty workshop on intellectual dishonesty
  • Objectives: learn to detect plagiarism with the aid of electronic tools; know the legal basis of busting plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty, examine the pedagogical issues involved
  • Methodology: panel discussion from different fields, use of detection tools
  • Workshop schedule and venue: Monday, 27 Sept 2010, 2-5pm, DILC
  • Workshop participants: UPD faculty
  • Workshop program: panel discussions (pedagogical, legal, computational issues) - 2-3:30pm (1.5 hrs); skills acquisition - 3:30-5:00pm (1.5 hrs)

Related Issues

  1. Collaboration. "Real world" jobs require people to work together. Shouldn't students start "collaborating" in school? How or when does collaboration become "cheating"?
  2. Knowledge and skills assessment. Which methods of assessment discourage cheating? Are exams, term papers effective in the assessment of students' knowledge?
  3. Intellectual dishonesty and licenses (copyright, Creative Commons, open source). Certain licenses encourage "copying" but certainly not cheating.
  4. courses of action at various levels to address plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty: department, college, university, court

Suggested Readings

See Also