User:Amrago: Difference between revisions

From Iskomunidad
Amrago (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Amrago (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Alona M. Rago
PHILIPPINE CODE PROJECT
[[U.P. Law Center and law ay mabait||ateneo]]
Chateau Verde Apacible St., U.P. Campus, Diliman, Q.C.
November 24, 2009
 
 
MINUTES OF THE MEETING
 
PRESENT
 
Director Jesus Disini M. Jr.
Atty. Nicholas Felix L. Ty
Atty. Rebecca Khan
Atty. D. Anissia Salvador-Directo
Patrick Henry D. Salazar
Michelle Arias
 
I.  CALL TO ORDER
    The meeting was called to order at around 8:00 pm presided by Atty. Nicky Ty.
 
II. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION
   
    A.  Appointment of Lead Consultant for the Project
          It has been resolved that Atty. D. Anissia Salvador-Directo shall be the lead   
    consultant of the project.  As lead consultant, she will be the point person with the
    primary duty of supervising the project and coordinating with the members.
 
    B.  Identification of Leads for Potential Resource Persons
 
    1.  Jun Lopez/Lea Olores
        1602-A East Tower,                  - c/o Atty D. Anissia Salvador-Directo
        Tektite Towers, Makati
        Tel. No.: 635-0362/687-4863
 
    2.  US Code Office and                  - try sending an e-mail
        similar code offices in each State
 
    3.  Prof. John Molo                      - c/o Atty. Nicholas Ty
 
    4.  Atty. Antonio Santos 
        (Law Librarian)
   
    5. American Bar Association            - c/o Atty. Rebecca Khan
        (ABA) Law
 
    6.  Prof. Araceli Baviera
              Prof. Baviera participated in the Code Commission responsible for the drafting
              of the Civil Code
 
    7.  George
              Dir. Disini mentioned a meeting with USA-AIT regarding funding of the project
 
 
    C.  Egroupware
 
              Members of the project were encouraged to use the "EGROUPWARE' with address at
        http://10.34.50.13/egroupware as an online mechanism for posting of official
        communication among the members and monitoring of project status and developments.
        Username and passwords are available at IGLR Office through the secretary.
 
              Research assistants were also assigned to develop a "WIKI" or an online 
        homepage through the WIKI feature of the EGROUPWARE.  It shall contain an outline
        of the titles, brief descriptions, and the links to the US Code, the different State
        Codes of the United States of America (Mainland), and other relevant research
        materials.
 
    D.  Research Updates on the US Code
       
              Dir. Disini proposed that the members explore the US Code, understand how it
        was divided into subcategories and find out where certain topics were inserted in 
        the Code.  Further, he suggested that the differentoutlines of the different State
        codes in the USA be studied and compared with one another.  By looking at these
        outlines, the principle or ruling behind their structure could be discovered.  He
        recommended a review of the US Court System since Federal Laws which govern
        interstate activities are distinct and have a separate jurisdiction from State 
        Laws.  It is also worthy to note that certain laws are exclusive to the federal
        system and other laws enacted by the federal government overwrites state law. 
        While US is of common law jurisdiction, which makes the US Louisiana are under
        civil law jurisdiction, which makes the US Code and certain State Codes
        appropriate bases for the drafting or the Philippine Code.
 
              Atty, Khan mentioned that there are also certain gaps or imperfections in the

Latest revision as of 16:43, 6 January 2010

PHILIPPINE CODE PROJECT Chateau Verde Apacible St., U.P. Campus, Diliman, Q.C. November 24, 2009


MINUTES OF THE MEETING

PRESENT

Director Jesus Disini M. Jr. Atty. Nicholas Felix L. Ty Atty. Rebecca Khan Atty. D. Anissia Salvador-Directo Patrick Henry D. Salazar Michelle Arias

I. CALL TO ORDER

   The meeting was called to order at around 8:00 pm presided by Atty. Nicky Ty.

II. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION

   A.  Appointment of Lead Consultant for the Project

         It has been resolved that Atty. D. Anissia Salvador-Directo shall be the lead     
    consultant of the project.  As lead consultant, she will be the point person with the
    primary duty of supervising the project and coordinating with the members.
    B.  Identification of Leads for Potential Resource Persons
    1.  Jun Lopez/Lea Olores
        1602-A East Tower,                   - c/o Atty D. Anissia Salvador-Directo 
        Tektite Towers, Makati 
        Tel. No.: 635-0362/687-4863
    2.  US Code Office and                   - try sending an e-mail
        similar code offices in each State
    3.  Prof. John Molo                      - c/o Atty. Nicholas Ty
    4.  Atty. Antonio Santos  
        (Law Librarian)
   
    5.  American Bar Association             - c/o Atty. Rebecca Khan
        (ABA) Law
    6.  Prof. Araceli Baviera
             Prof. Baviera participated in the Code Commission responsible for the drafting
             of the Civil Code
    7.  George
             Dir. Disini mentioned a meeting with USA-AIT regarding funding of the project


    C.  Egroupware
             Members of the project were encouraged to use the "EGROUPWARE' with address at 
        http://10.34.50.13/egroupware as an online mechanism for posting of official 
        communication among the members and monitoring of project status and developments.
        Username and passwords are available at IGLR Office through the secretary.
             Research assistants were also assigned to develop a "WIKI" or an online  
        homepage through the WIKI feature of the EGROUPWARE.  It shall contain an outline
        of the titles, brief descriptions, and the links to the US Code, the different State
        Codes of the United States of America (Mainland), and other relevant research 
        materials.
    D.  Research Updates on the US Code
        
             Dir. Disini proposed that the members explore the US Code, understand how it 
        was divided into subcategories and find out where certain topics were inserted in  
        the Code.  Further, he suggested that the differentoutlines of the different State
        codes in the USA be studied and compared with one another.  By looking at these 
        outlines, the principle or ruling behind their structure could be discovered.  He
        recommended a review of the US Court System since Federal Laws which govern 
        interstate activities are distinct and have a separate jurisdiction from State   
        Laws.  It is also worthy to note that certain laws are exclusive to the federal 
        system and other laws enacted by the federal government overwrites state law.  
        While US is of common law jurisdiction, which makes the US Louisiana are under 
        civil law jurisdiction, which makes the US Code and certain State Codes 
        appropriate bases for the drafting or the Philippine Code.
             Atty, Khan mentioned that there are also certain gaps or imperfections in the