Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Community portal
Contributor's Page
Flipbook
Directories
Catalogs
Theses
Help Support
Getting Started
Create a New Page
Basic Formatting
Create Events and Announcements
Flibook Tutorial
Iskomunidad
Search
Search
Appearance
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ending Endo
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Refresh
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Cargo data
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
Nadong, J.C.F., & Pagdanganan, A.P.O. (2019). Ending Endo: A Comparative Critical Discourse Analysis of Print and Online News on Contractualization, Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis, University of the Philippines College of Mass Communication. Being considered as the “fourth estate” of society, one would assume that the media plays a bigger role in showing the pervasiveness of contractualization. However, the variety of topics driving conversations about this topic in mass media is restricted. The researchers sought to understand the discourse on contractualization in leading Filipino print and online news media. They were guided by the tenets of Norman Fairclough’s (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Holli Semetko and Patti Valkenburg’s (2000) News Frames, and Theo Van Leeuwen and Ruth Wodak’s (1999) Modes of Legitimation. This study also used an extensive content analysis of the coverage on contractualization, which was subjected to a qualitative reading. News gatekeepers controlled the narrative of the news stories on contractualization through their various decisions concerning coverage’s content and form. Print and online news coverage differed in terms of the length of their published articles and their use of visual elements. Across both platforms, invoking personal authority was the most typical way of legitimizing discourse. Furthermore, print and online news outlets did not reflect the private interests of their prominent owners and shareholders. However, the news gatekeepers did favor the sentiments of individuals or institutions in power.https://iskwiki.upd.edu.ph/viewer/?fb=2014-54059-A-Compar#page-1 [[Category:Theses]] [[Category:CMC Thesis]] [[Category:Department of Communication Research Thesis]] [[Category:2019 Thesis]] [[Category:Thesis--Comparative CDA]] [[Category:Thesis--Contractualization]]https://iskwiki.upd.edu.ph/viewer/?fb=2014-54059-A-Compar#page-1
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Iskomunidad may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Iskomunidad:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Ending Endo
Add topic